Use cases
Prove one disputed-fact workflow before expanding the platform.
Start with one authorized matter, visible support and conflicts, explicit insufficiency, and reviewer-gated sign-off.
Disputed-fact assurance before a deadline
Shipped in productionWalk a Texas commercial dispute from matter intake through source-linked evidence, surfaced conflicts, citation posture, and attorney release review.
90-day Claim Assurance evaluation
Requires rollout conditionsPrivateScope one matter and deadline, agree on a manual baseline, and measure review time, exact-span acceptance, defect interception, and paid continuation.
The current workflow uses a candidate-generation heuristic and is not yet calibrated for production reliance; benchmark and attorney review gates are required.
Citation and release review
Requires rollout conditionsPrivateInspect evidence packs, explicit citation trust states, Greenbook checks, and the attorney-owned release decision without implying autonomous legal judgment.
All citation states are visible; some external verifiers can remain unavailable or degraded.